This directory provides information about the baseline data provided by Dopamine. The default hyperparameter configuration for the 4 agents we are providing yields a standardized “apples to apples” comparison between them.
The default configuration files files for each agent (set up with gin configuration framework) are:
dopamine/agents/dqn/configs/dqn.gindopamine/agents/rainbow/configs/c51.gindopamine/agents/rainbow/configs/rainbow.gindopamine/agents/implicit_quantile/configs/implicit_quantile.ginOur results compare the agents with the same hyperparameters: target network update frequency, frequency at which exploratory actions are selected (ε), the length of the schedule over which ε is annealed, and the number of agent steps before training occurs. Changing these parameters can significantly affect performance, without necessarily being indicative of an algorithmic difference. Unsurprisingly, DQN performs much better when trained with 1% of exploratory actions instead of 10% (as used in the original Nature paper). Step size and optimizer were taken as published. The table below summarizes our choices. All numbers are in ALE frames.
| Our baseline results | DQN | C51 | Rainbow | IQN | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Training ε | 0.01 | 0.1 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Evaluation ε | 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.001 | * | 0.001 |
| ε decay schedule | 1,000,000 frames | 4,000,000 frames | 4,000,000 frames | 1,000,000 frames | 4,000,000 frames |
| Min. history to start learning | 80,000 frames | 200,000 frames | 200,000 frames | 80,000 frames | 200,000 frames |
| Target network update frequency | 32,000 frames | 40,000 frames | 40,000 frames | 32,000 frames | 40,000 frames |
We provide a website where you can quickly visualize the training runs for all our default agents.
The plots are rendered from a set of JSON files which we compiled. These may prove useful in their own right to compare against results obtained from other frameworks.