This guide describes how to troubleshoot common issues when using Gson.
ClassCastException
when using deserialized objectSymptom: ClassCastException
is thrown when accessing an object deserialized by Gson
Reason:
Solution: Make sure your code adheres to the following:
fromJson(..., List.class)
, create for example a TypeToken<List<MyClass>>
.
See the user guide for more information.TypeToken
prefer the Gson.fromJson
overloads with TypeToken
parameter such as fromJson(Reader, TypeToken)
.
The overloads with Type
parameter do not provide any type-safety guarantees.TypeToken
make sure you don’t capture a type variable. For example avoid something like new TypeToken<List<T>>()
(where T
is a type variable). Due to Java type erasure the actual type of T
is not available at runtime. Refactor your code to pass around TypeToken
instances or use TypeToken.getParameterized(...)
, for example TypeToken.getParameterized(List.class, elementType)
where elementType
is a type you have to provide separately.If you are using a code shrinking tool such as ProGuard or R8 (for example when building an Android app), make sure it is correctly configured to keep generic signatures and to keep Gson’s TypeToken
class. See the Android example for more information.
InaccessibleObjectException
: ‘module … does not “opens …” to unnamed module’Symptom: An exception with a message in the form ‘module … does not “opens …” to unnamed module’ is thrown
Reason: You use Gson by accident to access internal fields of third-party classes
Solution: Write custom Gson TypeAdapter
implementations for the affected classes or change the type of your data.
If you already wrote a custom adapter, but it is not used, see this troubleshooting point.
If this occurs for a field in one of your classes which you did not actually want to serialize or deserialize in the first place, you can exclude that field, see the user guide.
Explanation:
When no built-in adapter for a type exists and no custom adapter has been registered, Gson falls back to using reflection to access the fields of a class (including private
ones). Most likely you are seeing this error because you (by accident) rely on the reflection-based adapter for third-party classes. That should be avoided because you make yourself dependent on the implementation details of these classes which could change at any point. For the JDK it is also not possible anymore to access internal fields using reflection starting with JDK 17, see JEP 403.
If you want to prevent using reflection on third-party classes in the future you can write your own ReflectionAccessFilter
or use one of the predefined ones, such as ReflectionAccessFilter.BLOCK_ALL_PLATFORM
.
InaccessibleObjectException
: ‘module … does not “opens …” to module com.google.gson’Symptom: An exception with a message in the form ‘module … does not “opens …” to module com.google.gson’ is thrown
Reason:
Solution: Make sure the module-info.java
file of your project allows Gson to use reflection on your classes, for example:
module mymodule {
requires com.google.gson;
opens mypackage to com.google.gson;
}
Or in case this occurs for a field in one of your classes which you did not actually want to serialize or deserialize in the first place, you can exclude that field, see the user guide.
Symptom: Your Android app is working fine in Debug mode but fails in Release mode and the JSON properties have seemingly random names such as a
, b
, …
Reason: You probably have not configured ProGuard / R8 correctly
Solution: Make sure you have configured ProGuard / R8 correctly to preserve the names of your fields. See the Android example for more information.
Symptom: You released a new version of your Android app and it fails to parse JSON data created by the previous version of your app
Reason: You probably have not configured ProGuard / R8 correctly; probably the field names are being obfuscated and their naming changed between the versions of your app
Solution: Make sure you have configured ProGuard / R8 correctly to preserve the names of your fields. See the Android example for more information.
If you want to preserve backward compatibility for you app you can use @SerializedName
on the fields to specify the obfuscated name as alternate, for example: @SerializedName(value = "myprop", alternate = "a")
Normally ProGuard and R8 produce a mapping file, this makes it easier to find out the obfuscated field names instead of having to find them out through trial and error or other means. See the Android Studio user guide for more information.
Symptom: You have assign default values to fields but after deserialization the fields have their standard value (such as null
or 0
)
Reason: Gson cannot invoke the constructor of your class and falls back to JDK Unsafe
(or similar means)
Solution: Make sure that the class:
static
(explicitly or implicitly when it is a top-level class)Otherwise Gson will by default try to use JDK Unsafe
or similar means to create an instance of your class without invoking the constructor and without running any initializers. You can also disable that behavior through GsonBuilder.disableJdkUnsafe()
to notice such issues early on.
null
values for anonymous and local classesSymptom: Objects of a class are always serialized as JSON null
/ always deserialized as Java null
Reason: The class you are serializing or deserializing is an anonymous or a local class (or you have specified a custom ExclusionStrategy
)
Solution: Convert the class to a static
nested class. If the class is already static
make sure you have not specified a Gson ExclusionStrategy
which might exclude the class.
Notes:
Symptom: JSON output for Map
keys is unexpected / cannot be deserialized again
Reason: The Map
key type is ‘complex’ and you have not configured the GsonBuilder
properly
Solution: Use GsonBuilder.enableComplexMapKeySerialization()
. See also the user guide for more information.
MalformedJsonException
Symptom: JSON parsing fails with MalformedJsonException
Reason: The JSON data is actually malformed
Solution: During debugging, log the JSON data right before calling Gson methods or set a breakpoint to inspect the data and make sure it has the expected format. Sometimes APIs might return HTML error pages (instead of JSON data) when reaching rate limits or when other errors occur. Also read the location information of the MalformedJsonException
exception message, it indicates where exactly in the document the malformed data was detected, including the JSONPath.
For example, let’s assume you want to deserialize the following JSON data:
{
"languages": [
"English",
"French",
]
}
This will fail with an exception similar to this one: MalformedJsonException: Use JsonReader.setStrictness(Strictness.LENIENT) to accept malformed JSON at line 5 column 4 path $.languages[2]
The problem here is the trailing comma (,
) after "French"
, trailing commas are not allowed by the JSON specification. The location information “line 5 column 4” points to the ]
in the JSON data (with some slight inaccuracies) because Gson expected another value after ,
instead of the closing ]
. The JSONPath $.languages[2]
in the exception message also points there: $.
refers to the root object, languages
refers to its member of that name and [2]
refers to the (missing) third value in the JSON array value of that member (numbering starts at 0, so it is [2]
instead of [3]
).
The proper solution here is to fix the malformed JSON data.
To spot syntax errors in the JSON data easily you can open it in an editor with support for JSON, for example Visual Studio Code. It will highlight within the JSON data the error location and show why the JSON data is considered invalid.
double
Symptom: JSON data contains an integral number such as 45
but Gson returns it as double
Reason: When parsing a JSON number as Object
, Gson will by default always return a double
Solution: Use GsonBuilder.setObjectToNumberStrategy
to specify what type of number should be returned
Symptom: Gson parses malformed JSON without throwing any exceptions
Reason: Due to legacy reasons Gson performs parsing by default in lenient mode
Solution: If you are using Gson 2.11.0 or newer, call GsonBuilder.setStrictness
,
JsonReader.setStrictness
and JsonWriter.setStrictness
with Strictness.STRICT
to overwrite the default lenient behavior of Gson
and make these classes strictly adhere to the JSON specification.
Otherwise if you are using an older Gson version, see the Gson
class documentation
section “JSON Strictness handling” for alternative solutions.
IllegalStateException
: “Expected … but was …”Symptom: An IllegalStateException
with a message in the form “Expected … but was …” is thrown
Reason:
Solution: Make sure that your classes correctly model the JSON data. Also during debugging log the JSON data right before calling Gson methods or set a breakpoint to inspect the data and make sure it has the expected format. Read the location information of the exception message, it indicates where exactly in the document the error occurred, including the JSONPath.
For example, let’s assume you have the following Java class:
class WebPage {
String languages;
}
And you want to deserialize the following JSON data:
{
"languages": ["English", "French"]
}
This will fail with an exception similar to this one: IllegalStateException: Expected a string but was BEGIN_ARRAY at line 2 column 17 path $.languages
This means Gson expected a JSON string value but found the beginning of a JSON array ([
). The location information “line 2 column 17” points to the [
in the JSON data (with some slight inaccuracies), so does the JSONPath $.languages
in the exception message. It refers to the languages
member of the root object ($.
).
The solution here is to change in the WebPage
class the field String languages
to List<String> languages
.
If you are sure that the JSON data is correct and the exception message is “Expected BEGIN_OBJECT but was …”, then this might indicate that Gson has no built-in adapter for the type.
Gson then tries to use reflection and expects that the data is a JSON object (hence the error message “Expected BEGIN_OBJECT …”). In that case you have to write a custom TypeAdapter
for that type. If you already wrote a custom adapter, but it is not used, see this troubleshooting point.
IllegalStateException
: “Expected … but was NULL”Symptom: An IllegalStateException
with a message in the form “Expected … but was NULL” is thrown
Reason:
TypeAdapter
which does not properly handle JSON null valuesSolution: If this occurs for a custom adapter you wrote, add code similar to the following at the beginning of its read
method:
@Override
public MyClass read(JsonReader in) throws IOException {
if (in.peek() == JsonToken.NULL) {
in.nextNull();
return null;
}
...
}
Alternatively you can call nullSafe()
on the adapter instance you created.
Symptom: Properties are missing in the JSON output
Reason: Gson by default omits JSON null from the output (or: ProGuard / R8 is not configured correctly and removed unused fields)
Solution: Use GsonBuilder.serializeNulls()
Note: Gson does not support anonymous and local classes and will serialize them as JSON null, see the related troubleshooting point.
Symptom: The JSON output differs when running on newer Android versions
Reason: You use Gson by accident to access internal fields of Android classes
Solution: Write custom Gson TypeAdapter
implementations for the affected classes or change the type of your data
Explanation:
When no built-in adapter for a type exists and no custom adapter has been registered, Gson falls back to using reflection to access the fields of a class (including private
ones). Most likely you are experiencing this issue because you (by accident) rely on the reflection-based adapter for Android classes. That should be avoided because you make yourself dependent on the implementation details of these classes which could change at any point.
If you want to prevent using reflection on third-party classes in the future you can write your own ReflectionAccessFilter
or use one of the predefined ones, such as ReflectionAccessFilter.BLOCK_ALL_PLATFORM
.
static
fieldsSymptom: The JSON output contains values of static
fields
Reason: You used GsonBuilder.excludeFieldsWithModifiers
to overwrite the default excluded modifiers
Solution: When calling GsonBuilder.excludeFieldsWithModifiers
you overwrite the default excluded modifiers. Therefore, you have to explicitly exclude static
fields if desired. This can be done by adding Modifier.STATIC
as additional argument to the excludeFieldsWithModifiers
call.
NoSuchMethodError
when calling Gson methodsSymptom: A java.lang.NoSuchMethodError
is thrown when trying to call certain Gson methods
Reason:
Solution: First disable any code shrinking tools such as ProGuard or R8 and check if the issue persists. If not, you have to tweak the configuration of that tool to not modify Gson classes. Otherwise verify that the Gson JAR on your classpath is the same you are compiling against, and that there is only one Gson JAR on your classpath. See this Stack Overflow question to find out where a class is loaded from. For example, for debugging you could include the following code:
System.out.println(Gson.class.getProtectionDomain().getCodeSource().getLocation());
If that fails with a NullPointerException
you have to try one of the other ways to find out where a class is loaded from.
IllegalArgumentException
: ‘Class … declares multiple JSON fields named ‘…’’Symptom: An exception with the message ‘Class … declares multiple JSON fields named ‘…’’ is thrown
Reason:
@SerializedName
annotation for a field collides with the name of another fieldFieldNamingStrategy
you have specified produces conflicting field namesGson prevents multiple fields with the same name because during deserialization it would be ambiguous for which field the JSON data should be deserialized. For serialization it would cause the same field to appear multiple times in JSON. While the JSON specification permits this, it is likely that the application parsing the JSON data will not handle it correctly.
Solution: First identify the fields with conflicting names based on the exception message. Then decide if you want to rename one of them using the @SerializedName
annotation, or if you want to exclude one of them. When excluding one of the fields you have to apply the exclusion for both serialization and deserialization (even if your application only performs one of these actions) because the duplicate field check cannot differentiate between these actions.
UnsupportedOperationException
when serializing or deserializing java.lang.Class
Symptom: An UnsupportedOperationException
is thrown when trying to serialize or deserialize java.lang.Class
Reason: Gson intentionally does not permit serializing and deserializing java.lang.Class
for security reasons. Otherwise a malicious user could make your application load an arbitrary class from the classpath and, depending on what your application does with the Class
, in the worst case perform a remote code execution attack.
Solution: First check if you really need to serialize or deserialize a Class
. Often it is possible to use string aliases and then map them to the known Class
; you could write a custom TypeAdapter
to do this. If the Class
values are not known in advance, try to introduce a common base class or interface for all these classes and then verify that the deserialized class is a subclass. For example assuming the base class is called MyBaseClass
, your custom TypeAdapter
should load the class like this:
Class.forName(jsonString, false, getClass().getClassLoader()).asSubclass(MyBaseClass.class)
This will not initialize arbitrary classes, and it will throw a ClassCastException
if the loaded class is not the same as or a subclass of MyBaseClass
.
Symptom: You have registered a custom TypeAdapter
(or JsonSerializer
or JsonDeserializer
) on a GsonBuilder
, but Gson is not using your adapter
Reason:
Gson
instance is not actually usedSolution:
Gson
instance on which you have registered the adapter is actually used. Possibly parts of your application are using a different Gson
instance, or you are using a framework such as Spring which is using a different Gson
instance with default configuration (in that case have a look at the framework-specific configuration options).GsonBuilder.registerTypeAdapter(...)
takes the adapter as Object
argument, so you will not see a compilation error when you provide the wrong type.
For example when you want to register an adapter for MyClass
, you should call registerTypeAdapter(MyClass.class, new MyClassAdapter())
.java.util.Date
and java.sql.Date
.registerTypeAdapter
only registers an adapter for the specified class, but not for subclasses. Use registerTypeHierarchyAdapter
to also handle subclasses.registerTypeAdapter
because Gson only uses the adapter if there is an exact match for the types.
For example if you register an adapter for List<Number>
it won’t be used for List
(raw type), List<Integer>
or ArrayList<Number>
.
You can solve this by writing a TypeAdapterFactory
instead, which manually checks if the type matches.boolean
, you might also want to register it for the wrapper type java.lang.Boolean
, and the other way around.JsonElement
(and subclasses) and for Object
cannot be overwritten. However, as workaround for a field of those types you can use the @JsonAdapter
annotation to specify a custom adapter.IllegalStateException
: ‘TypeToken must be created with a type argument’ RuntimeException
: ‘Missing type parameter’Symptom: An IllegalStateException
with the message ‘TypeToken must be created with a type argument’ is thrown.
For older Gson versions a RuntimeException
with message ‘Missing type parameter’ is thrown.
Reason:
TypeToken
without type argument, for example new TypeToken() {}
(note the missing <...>
). You always have to provide the type argument, for example like this: new TypeToken<List<String>>() {}
. Normally the compiler will also emit a ‘raw types’ warning when you forget the <...>
.Solution: When you are using a code shrinking tool such as ProGuard or R8 you have to adjust your configuration to include the following rules:
# Keep generic signatures; needed for correct type resolution
-keepattributes Signature
# Keep class TypeToken (respectively its generic signature)
-keep class com.google.gson.reflect.TypeToken { *; }
# Keep any (anonymous) classes extending TypeToken
-keep class * extends com.google.gson.reflect.TypeToken
See also the Android example for more information.
Note: For newer Gson versions these rules might be applied automatically; make sure you are using the latest Gson version and the latest version of the code shrinking tool.
JsonIOException
: ‘Abstract classes can’t be instantiated!’ (R8)Symptom: A JsonIOException
with the message ‘Abstract classes can’t be instantiated!’ is thrown; the class mentioned in the exception message is not actually abstract
in your source code, and you are using the code shrinking tool R8 (Android app builds normally have this configured by default).
Note: If the class which you are trying to deserialize is actually abstract, then this exception is probably unrelated to R8 and you will have to implement a custom InstanceCreator
or TypeAdapter
which creates an instance of a non-abstract subclass of the class. If you already wrote a custom adapter, but it is not used, see this troubleshooting point.
Reason: The code shrinking tool R8 performs optimizations where it removes the no-args constructor from a class and makes the class abstract
. Due to this Gson cannot create an instance of the class.
Solution: Make sure the class has a no-args constructor, then adjust your R8 configuration file to keep the constructor of the class. For example:
# Keep the no-args constructor of the deserialized class
-keepclassmembers class com.example.MyClass {
<init>();
}
You can also use <init>(...);
to keep all constructors of that class, but then you might actually rely on sun.misc.Unsafe
on both JDK and Android to create classes without no-args constructor, see GsonBuilder.disableJdkUnsafe()
for more information.
For Android you can add this rule to the proguard-rules.pro
file, see also the Android documentation. In case the class name in the exception message is obfuscated, see the Android documentation about retracing.
For Android you can alternatively use the @Keep
annotation on the class or constructor you want to keep. That might be easier than having to maintain a custom R8 configuration.
Note that the latest Gson versions (> 2.10.1) specify a default R8 configuration. If your class is a top-level class or is static
, has a no-args constructor and its fields are annotated with Gson’s @SerializedName
, you might not have to perform any additional R8 configuration.
IllegalArgumentException
: ‘TypeToken type argument must not contain a type variable’Symptom: An exception with the message ‘TypeToken type argument must not contain a type variable’ is thrown
Reason: This exception is thrown when you create an anonymous TypeToken
subclass which captures a type variable, for example new TypeToken<List<T>>() {}
(where T
is a type variable). At compile time such code looks safe and you can use the type List<T>
without any warnings. However, this code is not actually type-safe because at runtime due to type erasure only the upper bound of the type variable is available. For the previous example that would be List<Object>
. When using such a TypeToken
with any Gson methods performing deserialization this would lead to confusing and difficult to debug ClassCastException
s. For serialization it can in some cases also lead to undesired results.
Note: Earlier version of Gson unfortunately did not prevent capturing type variables, which caused many users to unwittingly write type-unsafe code.
Solution:
TypeToken.getParameterized(...)
, for example TypeToken.getParameterized(List.class, elementType)
where elementType
is a type you have to provide separately.reified
type parameters, that means change <T>
to <reified T>
, if possible. If you have a chain of functions with type parameters you will probably have to make all of them reified
.TypeToken
for any Gson method, use a general purpose ‘type token’ implementation provided by a different library instead, for example Guava’s com.google.common.reflect.TypeToken
.For backward compatibility it is possible to restore Gson’s old behavior of allowing TypeToken
to capture type variables by setting the system property gson.allowCapturingTypeVariables
to "true"
, however:
"true"
, but never to any other value or manually clear it. Otherwise this might counteract any libraries you are using which might have deliberately set the system property because they rely on its behavior.