Better GWT unit testing
This project is maintained by google
Testing GWT applications using GWTTestCase
can be a pain - it's slower than
using pure Java tests, and you can't use reflection-based tools like mocking
frameworks. But if you've tried to test widgets using normal test cases, you've
probably run into this error:
ERROR: GWT.create() is only usable in client code! It cannot be called,
for example, from server code. If you are running a unit test, check that
your test case extends GWTTestCase and that GWT.create() is not called
from within an initializer or constructor.
GwtMockito solves this and other GWT-related testing problems by allowing you to call GWT.create from JUnit tests, returning Mockito mocks.
Getting started with GwtMockito using Junit 4.5+ is easy. Just annotate your test
with @RunWith(GwtMockitoTestRunner.class)
, then any calls to GWT.create
encountered will return Mockito mocks instead of throwing exceptions:
@RunWith(GwtMockitoTestRunner.class)
public class MyTest {
@Test
public void shouldReturnMocksFromGwtCreate() {
Label myLabel = GWT.create(Label.class);
when(myLabel.getText()).thenReturn("some text");
assertEquals("some text", myLabel.getText());
}
}
GwtMockito also creates fake implementations of all UiBinders that automatically
populate @UiField
s with Mockito mocks. Suppose you have a widget that looks
like this:
public class MyWidget extends Composite {
interface MyUiBinder extends UiBinder<Widget, MyWidget> {}
private final MyUiBinder uiBinder = GWT.create(MyUiBinder.class);
@UiField Label numberLabel;
private final NumberFormatter formatter;
public MyWidget(NumberFormatter formatter) {
this.formatter = formatter;
initWidget(uiBinder.createAndBindUi(this);
}
void setNumber(int number) {
numberLabel.setText(formatter.format(number));
}
}
When createAndBindUi
is called, GwtMockito will automatically populate
numberLabel
with a mock object. Since @UiField
s are package-visible, they
can be read from your unit tests, which lets you test this widget as follows:
@RunWith(GwtMockitoTestRunner.class)
public class MyWidgetTest {
@Mock NumberFormatter formatter;
private MyWidget widget;
@Before
public void setUp() {
widget = new MyWidget(formatter);
}
@Test
public void shouldFormatNumber() {
when(formatter.format(5)).thenReturn("5.00");
widget.setNumber(5);
verify(widget.numberLabel).setText("5.00");
}
}
Note that GwtMockito supports the @Mock
annotation from Mockito, allowing
standard Mockito mocks to be mixed with mocks created by GwtMockito.
That's all you need to know to get started - read on if you're interested in hearing about some advanced features.
Returning mocks from GWT.create
isn't very useful if you don't have any way to
verify or set behaviors on them. You can do this by annotating a field in your
test with @GwtMock
- this will cause all calls to GWT.create
for that type
to return a mock stored in that field, allowing you to reference it in your
test. So if you have a class that looks like
public class MyClass {
public MyClass() {
SomeInterface myInterface = GWT.create(SomeInterface.class);
myInterface.setSomething(true);
}
}
then you can verify that it works correctly by writing a test that looks like this:
@RunWith(GwtMockitoTestRunner.class)
public class MyClassTest {
@GwtMock SomeInterface mockInterface;
@Test
public void constructorShouldSetSomething() {
new MyClass();
verify(mockInterface).setSomething(true);
}
}
By default, GwtMockito will return fake implementations (which don't require you to specify mock behavior) for any classes extending the following types:
You can add fakes for additional types by invoking
GwtMockito.useProviderForType(Class, FakeProvider)
in your setUp
method.
This will cause all calls to GWT.create
for the given class or its subclasses
to invoke the given FakeProvider
to determine what to return. See the
javadoc reference for more details.
Mockito does not normally allow final classes and methods to be mocked. This
poses problems in GWT since JavaScript overlay types (which include
Element
and its subclasses) require all methods to be final. Fortunately,
GwtMockito does some classloader black magic to remove all final modifiers from
classes and interfaces, so the following test will pass:
@RunWith(GwtMockitoTestRunner.class)
public class MyTest {
@Mock Element element;
@Test
public void shouldReturnMocksFromGwtCreate() {
when(element.getClassName()).thenReturn("mockClass");
assertEquals("mockClass", myLabel.getClassName());
}
}
As long as your test uses GwtMockitoTestRunner
, it is possible to mock any
final methods.
Under normal circumstances, JUnit tests will fail with an UnsatisfiedLinkError
when encountering a native JSNI method. GwtMockito works around this problem
using more classloader black magic to provide no-op implementations for all
native methods using the following rules:
void
methods do nothing.String
s return the empty string.RETURNS_MOCKS
.These rules allow many tests to continue to work even when calling incindental
native methods. Note that this can be dangerous - a JSNI method that normally
always returns true
would always return false
when stubbed by GwtMockito.
As much as possible, you should isolate code that depends on JSNI into its own
class, inject that class into yours, and test the factored-out class using
GWTTestCase
.
Though GwtMockitoTestRunner
is the easiest way to use GwtMockito, it won't
work if you're using JUnit 3 or rely on another custom test runner. In these
situations, you can still get most of the benefit of GwtMockito by calling
GwtMockito.initMocks
directly. A test written in this style looks like this:
public class MyWidgetTest extends TestCase {
private MyWidget widget;
@Override
public void setUp() {
super.setUp();
GwtMockito.initMocks(this);
widget = new MyWidget() {
protected void initWidget(Widget w) {
// Disarm for testing
}
};
}
@Override
public void tearDown() {
super.tearDown();
GwtMockito.tearDown();
}
public void testSomething() {
// Test code goes here
}
}
The test must explicitly call initMocks
during its setup and tearDown
when
it is being teared down, or else state can leak between tests. When
instantiating a widget, the test must also subclass it and override initWidget
with a no-op implementation, or else it will fail when this method attempts to
call Javascript. Note that when testing in this way the features described in
"Mocking final classes and methods" and "Dealing with native methods" won't
work - there is no way to mock final methods or automatically replace native
methods without using GwtMockitoTestRunner
.
If you're using Maven, you can add the following to your <dependencies>
section:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.google.gwt.gwtmockito</groupId>
<artifactId>gwtmockito</artifactId>
<version>1.1.6</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
You can also download the jar directly or check out the source using git from https://github.com/google/gwtmockito.git. In these cases you will have to manually install the jars for Mockito and Javassist.
ClassCastException
s that we can't work around.NumberConstants
.History
methods.TextBox
methods.ClassCastException
s when mocking various classes.AsyncAnswers
. (Thanks to tinamou)@GwtMock
fields in superclasses the same way that Mockito does.
(Thanks to justinmk)getFake
should now just take a Class<?>
instsead of a
Class<? extends T>
. See here for an example.