A code review is a process where someone other than the author(s) of a piece of code examines that code.

At Google, we use code review to maintain the quality of our code and products.

This documentation is the canonical description of Google’s code review processes and policies.

This page is an overview of our code review process. There are two other large documents that are a part of this guide:

What Do Code Reviewers Look For?

Code reviews should look at:

See How To Do A Code Review for more information.

Picking the Best Reviewers

In general, you want to find the best reviewers you can who are capable of responding to your review within a reasonable period of time.

The best reviewer is the person who will be able to give you the most thorough and correct review for the piece of code you are writing. This usually means the owner(s) of the code, who may or may not be the people in the OWNERS file. Sometimes this means asking different people to review different parts of the CL.

If you find an ideal reviewer but they are not available, you should at least CC them on your change.

In-Person Reviews (and Pair Programming)

If you pair-programmed a piece of code with somebody who was qualified to do a good code review on it, then that code is considered reviewed.

You can also do in-person code reviews where the reviewer asks questions and the developer of the change speaks only when spoken to.

See Also