XLS Style Guide

The Google style guides recommend enforcing local consistency where stylistic choices are not predefined. This file notes some of the choices we make locally in the XLS project, with the relevant Google style guides (C++, Python) as their bases.

C++

Align the pointer or reference modifier token with the type; e.g. Foo& foo = ... instead of Foo &foo = ..., and Foo* foo = ... instead of Foo *foo= ....

Use /*parameter_name=*/value style comments if you choose to annotate arguments in a function invocation. clang-tidy recognizes this form, and provides a Tricorder notification if parameter_name is mismatched against the parameter name of the callee.

Prefer int64_t over int to avoid any possibility of overflow.

Always use Status or StatusOr for any error that a user could encounter.

Other than user-facing errors, use Status only in exceptional situations. For example, Status is good to signal that a required file does not exist but not for signaling that constant folding did not constant fold an expression.
See how heavyweight is StatusOr for more details on thinking about the costs involved.

Internal errors for conditions that should never be false can use CHECK, but may also use Status or StatusOr.

Prefer to brace single-statement blocks. Because the XLS_ASSIGN_OR_RETURN macro expands into multiple statements, this can cause problems when using unbraced single-statement blocks. Instead of XLS developers needing to think about individual cases of single statement blocks, we brace all single statement blocks.

Prefer using XLS_ASSIGN_OR_RETURN / XLS_RETURN_IF_ERROR when appropriate, but when binding a StatusOr wrapped value prefer to name it thing_or so that it can be referenced without the wrapper as thing; e.g.
```
absl::StatusOr<Thing> thing_or = f();
if (!thing_or.ok()) {
  // ... handling of the status via thing_or.status() and returning ...
}
const Thing& thing = thing_or.value();
```

Prefer CHECK to DCHECK, except that DCHECK can be used to verify conditions that it would be too expensive to verify in production, but that are fast enough to include outside of production.

Follow the C++ style guide for capitalization guidelines; however, in the somewhat ambiguous case of I/O (short for Input/Output, which we use often), the slash counts as internal spacing and therefore the capitalization we use is IO, as in WrapIO or StreamingIOReader.

Prefer to use the XLS_FRIEND_TEST macro vs friending manually-mangled test names.
At times it can be useful to test unit test a private/protected member of a class, and the XLS_FRIEND_TEST macro makes this possible. Note that the test case must live outside an unnamed namespace in the test file for the "friending" to work properly.

For simple const accessors, for the sake of consistency in the code base, and a weak preference towards the benefits of information hiding, prefer to return view types over the apparent type of the member; e.g.
```
class MyClass {
 public:
  // This return type is preferrable to `const std::vector<uint64_t>&`.
  absl::Span<const uint64_t> values() const { return values_; }

 private:
  std::vector<uint64_t> values_;
};
```

Follow the style guide's decision to avoid RTTI. In practice, this means down_cast<> should be used instead of dynamic_cast<>. However, the style guide says to avoid hand-implementing RTTI-like workarounds. The DSLX and XLScc frontends are places where avoiding RTTI would require implementing workarounds that end up looking a lot like RTTI, so dynamic_cast<> is common and accepted for those parts of the codebase. Elsewhere, especially with IR Node types, down_cast<> should be used instead.

Functions

Short or easily-explained argument lists (as defined by the developer) can be explained inline with the rest of the function comment. For more complex argument lists, the following pattern should be used:
```
// <Function description>
// Args:
//   arg1: <arg1 description>
//   arg2: <arg2 description>
//   ...
```

IR nodes

Unlike most data, IR elements should be passed as non-const pointers, even when expected to be const (which would usually indicate passing them as const references). Experience has shown that IR elements often develop non-const usages over time. Consider the case of IR analysis passes - those passes themselves rarely need to mutate their input data, but they build up data structures whose users often need to mutate their contents. In addition, treating elements as pointers makes equality comparisons more straightforward (avoid taking an address of a reference) and helps avoid accidental copies (assigning a reference to local, etc.). Non-const pointer usage propagates outwards such that the few cases where a const reference could actually be appropriate become odd outliers, so our guidance is that IR elements should uniformly be passed as non-const pointers.

Protocol buffers

Prefer to use proto3 specifications in all new protocol buffer files.

FAQ

How heavyweight is `StatusOr`?

What follows is the general guidance on how absl::StatusOr is used -- it is used extensively throughout the XLS code base as an error-style indicator object wrapper, so it is important to understand the mental model used for its cost.

Consider cost wise that: a) creating an ok StatusOr is cheap, b) creating a non-ok StatusOr is expensive (that is, imagine the non-ok Status within a StatusOr is the expensive part).

The implication being: if there's an API where "not found" is a reasonable outcome, prefer std::optional<> as a return value to indicate that / go with the grain of cost.

Something like a filesystem API would be a classic example -- where you shouldn't be rooting around looking for files that aren't there -- so a not-found absl::StatusOr result would be fine to use.

A good potential mental model is to imagine the program may run with logging of a traceback for every non-ok status that is created. (This is related to a debugging capability in Google internally called --util_status_save_stack_trace that captures backtraces when error Statuses are created.) Ideally, with such a logging flag turned on, the screen wouldn't fill up with "non error tracebacks", only tracebacks from events where something really went wrong.

XLS Style Guide

C++

Functions

IR nodes

Protocol buffers

FAQ

How heavyweight is StatusOr?

How heavyweight is `StatusOr`?